Our site was launched in 2011 to serve computer companies throughout the United States. Please add your listing here. Our rankings are based upon user interaction. To increase the rankings for a particular company simply visit their profile page and “Like” or “Thumbs Up” their profile. The vote up will increase the rankings for a particular company in every location (City & State) they are listed under. The recent additions section of the home page highlights the newest members of the site. The length of time a profile spends on the home page is determined by how quickly we are receiving submissions. In most cases we will typically display the 3-5 most recent additions to the site. Our listings are paid but they are human reviewed for quality. We do charge a $25 lifetime fee that guarantees your listing will be reviewed within 1-2 business days. If we do not approve your listing, your fee will be refunded.Please add your listing here. This h as been generated by G SA Conte nt Generator Demoversion!
The revived interpretation of Nokia 6310 brings back memories of the main model which had a group following during the primes of Nokia. Its reboot, made by HMD Global which licenses the Nokia brand, takes a couple of plan parts from the commendable phone and overhaul it for the fresher age. The new structure has a more noteworthy screen, a fairly remarkable plan of the buttons yet a comparative long battery length and solid structure. The rethought Nokia 6310 has commendable appeal and it is hard to neglect this device in faint green. The top half has the gold edge supplement enveloping the screen and the navigational pad and the base half has a numeric keypad. I'm a sucker for retro things and holding the Nokia 6310 feels divine. Not under any condition like mobile phones of today that have uncanny arrangement resemblances, the Nokia 6310 has a godlike arrangement - a person of its own and that would affect contraption sweethearts for quite a while.
Cost reduction was the reason for most of the revisions. Reducing manufacturing costs was vitally important to Commodore's survival during the price war and leaner years of the 16-bit era. The C64's original (NMOS based) motherboard went through two major redesigns and numerous sub-revisions, exchanging positions of the VIC-II, SID and PLA chips. Initially, a large portion of the cost was eliminated by reducing the number of discrete components, such as diodes and resistors, which enabled the use of a smaller printed circuit board. There were 16 total C64 motherboard revisions, aimed at simplifying and reducing manufacturing costs. Some board revisions were exclusive to PAL regions. All C64 motherboards were manufactured in Hong Kong. IC locations changed frequently on each motherboard revision, as did the presence or lack thereof of the metal RF shield around the VIC-II. PAL boards often had aluminized cardboard instead of a metal shield. The SID and VIC-II are socketed on all boards; however, the other ICs may be either socketed or soldered.
The term parameter (sometimes called formal parameter) is often used to refer to the variable as found in the function definition, while argument (sometimes called actual parameter) refers to the actual input supplied at function call. A parameter is an (unbound) variable, while the argument can be a literal or variable or more complex expression involving literals and variables. 2; f(a) are equivalent calls - while in call by reference, with a variable as argument, what is passed is a reference to that variable - even though the syntax for the function call could stay the same. The specification for pass-by-reference or pass-by-value would be made in the function declaration and/or definition. Parameters appear in procedure definitions; arguments appear in procedure calls. 2) the value 2 is the argument of the function. Loosely, a parameter is a type, and an argument is an instance. A parameter is an intrinsic property of the procedure, included in its definition. For example, in many languages, a procedure to add two supplied integers together and calculate the sum would need two parameters, one for each integer.
In an internal email that was seen by The New York Times, an Uber executive told employees that the hack was under investigation. “We don’t have an estimate right now as to when full access to tools will be restored, so thank you for bearing with us,” wrote Latha Maripuri, Uber’s chief information security officer. It was not the first time that a hacker had stolen data from Uber. In 2016, hackers stole information from 57 million driver and rider accounts and then approached Uber and demanded $100,000 to delete their copy of the data. Uber arranged the payment but kept the breach a secret for more than a year. Joe Sullivan, who was Uber’s top security executive at the time, was fired for his role in the company’s response to the hack. Mr. Sullivan was charged with obstructing justice for failing to disclose the breach to regulators and is currently on trial.
0 Comments